Sunday, February 21, 2016

Charles Koch: This is the one issue where Bernie Sanders is right

Here is a link to Charles Koch's article in the Washington Post.  Yes, this is the billionaire Charles Koch.

Koch is on target.

A snippet:

As he campaigns for the Democratic nomination for president, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) often sounds like he’s running as much against me as he is the other candidates. I have never met the senator, but I know from listening to him that we disagree on plenty when it comes to public policy.

Even so, I see benefits in searching for common ground and greater civility during this overly negative campaign season. That’s why, in spite of the fact that he often misrepresents where I stand on issues, the senator should know that we do agree on at least one — an issue that resonates with people who feel that hard work and making a contribution will no longer enable them to succeed.

The senator is upset with a political and economic system that is often rigged to help the privileged few at the expense of everyone else, particularly the least advantaged. He believes that we have a two-tiered society that increasingly dooms millions of our fellow citizens to lives of poverty and hopelessness. He thinks many corporations seek and benefit from corporate welfare while ordinary citizens are denied opportunities and a level playing field.

I agree with him.

It Is Not Income Inequality That Matters

Here is a post from Don Boudreaux's blog.  It illustrates why, for those concerned about the less fortunate, it is not income inequality that matters - it is their standard of living.

More inequality with a higher standard of living for the less fortunate and at least the same standard of living for all is better than less inequality with a lower standard of living for the less fortunate (and possibly for the majority).  It is the latter outcome that the proposals of the most vociferous about reducing inequality are most likely to produce.

-------------------------------------------------

This Atlantic story reveals how Americans lived 100 years ago. (HT Warren Smith) By the standards of a middle-class American today, that lifestyle was poor, inconvenient, dreary, and dangerous. (Only a few years later – in 1924 – the 16-year-old son of a sitting U.S. president would die of an infected blister that the boy got on his toe while playing tennis on the White House grounds.)

So here’s a question that I’ve asked in one form or another on earlier occasions, but that is so probing that I ask it again: What is the minimum amount of money that you would demand in exchange for your going back to live even as John D. Rockefeller lived in 1916? 21.7 million 2016 dollars (which are about one million 1916 dollars)? Would that do it? What about a billion 2016 – or 1916 – dollars? Would this sizable sum of dollars be enough to enable you to purchase a quantity of high-quality 1916 goods and services that would at least make you indifferent between living in 1916 America and living (on your current income) in 2016 America?

Think about it. Hard. Carefully.

The Armed Citizen - March 2016

From the American Rifleman.


Thursday, February 18, 2016

High Velocity Empowerment

Here is an article by Jessie Gaunt, published in the Sentinel, a publication of Jews For The Preservation of Firearms Ownership.

Most women are accustomed to a constant state of low-level threat assessment. Given that most women are at a distinct physical disadvantage to most men, and that they are likelier targets for a predatory assault than their male counterparts, most of us who have not either been extremely sheltered or made an active choice not to think about it are constantly alert to potential threats.

“How closely is that person following me? Is my path from the store to the parking lot well-lit the whole way? This person keeps creeping just into my personal space and it’s ringing all my internal alarms. I’m meeting someone new for dinner— does someone know where I am, and that I should be checking in with them? I’m really enjoying this party and meeting the people here, but I’d better not take my eyes off my drink, and I need to be very conscious of how much I have...”

Given this, women and firearms seem an obvious match. A gun levels the playing field, and barring injury or disability, it does not depend on upper-body strength, muscle mass or reach. Superior numbers improve one’s odds significantly less against a person carrying a gun than a person without one. A man has no physical advantage over a woman in firearms training. Gun rights should be a criti- cal feminist issue as well as a general human-rights issue. Yet, women are still a minority among shooters and especially as voices in the self defense community.

Women are socialized from birth to be soft and gentle where boys are rough and tumble, to be conscious of their disadvantage in strength and even to exaggerate it as a sign of femininity. Even when being pushed or outright bullied by another child, women are not encouraged to fight back, but rather to seek help from an authority figure—and may be told that if it’s a boy pushing them around, that he’s doing it because he likes her and she should keep that mind, even be flattered. All children are taught not to hit and bite and that starting fights is bad, but a boy is much likelier than a girl to be taught to stand his ground, hold his own, and that defending himself physically is a thing that he may have to do someday. Ironically, though there is no greater physical hurdle for a woman to use firearms to defend herself than a man, the psychological hurdle can be imposing.

Given this, learning to shoot and to come to terms with the idea of trusting and relying on herself to defend herself and her family from others’ violence can be a deeply powerful and transformative journey for a woman. A gun does not remove fear, but it does temper it and replace helplessness with the seed of control, the possibility of turning danger aside through your own actions. The process of learning to shoot can be—should be—inherently pleasurable and rewarding, simply because mastering a new skill is. Especially if guns were an object of fear in themselves beforehand, grasping the basics of the skill and getting to the point where improvement is tangible and mastery is imaginable is a tremendously profound experience.

If you are already living the majority of your life on alert—constantly in condition yellow or orange whenever out of an entirely safe place—then you’re already halfway to a self defense mindset. Taking the other half of the journey and developing the skill and the will to react to danger that comes to you rather than solely hoping to flee, find a defender or “hope and endure” is the next step—the step to self-reliance, self confidence and a wider world.

Tuesday, February 16, 2016

The Threefold Disaster that Comes from Imposing Economic Equality

George Reisman's blog post on inequality is on target.  It provides some good insight into microeconomics and shows why most of what you hear from the media, politicians, and most of your friends is just plain stupid.

Daily Mail "Exclusive" on the Clintons

Ben Ashford reports from Little Rock on a coming memoir from Sally Miller.  Sally is reputed to have had an affair with Bill Clinton.

Here is the link.

I have no idea how accurate the story is, but it does fit my impression of the Clintons to some degree.

In any case, the story is entertaining.


Book Review: Sally Pipes, 'The Way Out of Obamacare'

John Tamny's review of Sally Pipes's book, "The Way Out of Obamacare" is a worthwhile read.  You will see why Obamacare was a bad idea, a priori, and why what is happening with it is no surprise.

Monday, February 15, 2016

A message for the young know-nothings attending college

AN OLD WOMAN WALKED UP AND TIED HER OLD MULE TO THE HITCHING POST.
AS SHE STOOD THERE, BRUSHING SOME OF THE DUST FROM HER FACE AND CLOTHES, A YOUNG GUNSLINGER STEPPED OUT OF THE SALOON WITH A GUN IN ONE HAND AND A BOTTLE OF WHISKEY IN THE OTHER. THE YOUNG GUNSLINGER LOOKED AT THE OLD WOMAN AND LAUGHED, "HEY OLD WOMAN, HAVE YOU EVER DANCED?"

THE OLD WOMAN LOOKED UP AT THE GUNSLINGER AND SAID, "NO,... I NEVER DID DANCE... NEVER REALLY WANTED TO."

A CROWD HAD GATHERED AS THE GUNSLINGER GRINNED AND SAID "WELL, YOU OLD BAG, YOU'RE GONNA DANCE NOW," AND STARTED SHOOTING AT THE OLD WOMAN'S FEET.

THE OLD WOMAN PROSPECTOR -- NOT WANTING TO GET HER TOE BLOWN OFF --STARTED HOPPING AROUND. EVERYBODY WAS LAUGHING. WHEN HIS LAST BULLET HAD BEEN FIRED, THE YOUNG GUNSLINGER, STILL LAUGHING, HOLSTERED HIS GUN AND TURNED AROUND TO GO BACK INTO THE SALOON.

THE OLD WOMAN TURNED TO HER PACK MULE, PULLED OUT A DOUBLE-BARRELED SHOTGUN, AND COCKED BOTH HAMMERS. THE LOUD CLICKS CARRIED CLEARLY THROUGH THE DESERT AIR, AND THE CROWD STOPPED LAUGHING IMMEDIATELY.

THE YOUNG GUNSLINGER HEARD THE SOUNDS, TOO, AND HE TURNED AROUND VERY SLOWLY. THE SILENCE WAS ALMOST DEAFENING. THE CROWD WATCHED AS THE YOUNG GUNMAN STARED AT THE OLD WOMAN AND THE LARGE GAPING HOLES OF THOSE TWIN BARRELS.

THE BARRELS OF THE SHOTGUN NEVER WAVERED IN THE OLD WOMAN'S HANDS, AS SHE QUIETLY SAID, "SON, HAVE YOU EVER KISSED A MULE'S ASS?"

THE GUNSLINGER SWALLOWED HARD AND SAID, "NO M'AM... BUT I'VE ALWAYS WANTED TO.

THERE ARE FIVE LESSONS HERE FOR ALL OF US:

1 - Never be arrogant.
2 - Don't waste ammunition.
3 - Whiskey makes you think you're smarter than you are.
4 - Always make sure you know who has the power.
5 - Don't mess with old people; they didn't get old by being stupid.

Sunday, February 14, 2016

Hillary and Bernie both complain about excessive CEO pay, but the average CEO makes less than Hillary’s speaking fee

Here is a link to an article by Mark Perry of the American Enterprise Institute that puts Hillary and Bernie in their proper place, as either economic ignoramuses or con artists.

Friday, February 05, 2016

Orcas being tagged - and, perhaps, trying to figure out how to catch the taggers

Here is a link to a great video of orcas (killer whales) being tagged in Antartica.  Toward the end of the video, the orcas' behavior changes - they appear to be observing the taggers standing near the water and, perhaps, trying to figure out how to catch them.

Thursday, February 04, 2016

The other side of the gun story

Anti-gunners tend to neglect instances where citizens licensed to carry guns save lives.  Here is a link that offsets that bias.

Wednesday, February 03, 2016

Another example of Government screwing the less fortunate

Here is a link to an article by Lawrence McQuillan, "The Truth About Tesla."  The important message is not about Tesla, but about the Government actions that make it possible for Tesla to "steal" the money of the less fortunate.