Climate change Is not settled science - at least not the popular models

Here is a link to a video where Henrik Svensmark presents research results for his Climate Model.

HS's theory incorporates the effect of solar activity and cosmic rays.  It looks plausible and, if true, would be the dominant effect on climate change.  Moreover, it does not imply the disastrous climate future that the so called "settled climate science" implies.

I think that there is a good chance that HS is closer to the truth than the "settled science" crowd.  In any case, those who believe climate change, as popularly portrayed, is settled science and throw about terms like "climate change deniers" in an attempt to discredit people like HS strike me as anti-science - I interpret their attitude and behavior as providing evidence for concluding that they are not credible.