Here are some links that provide perspective on the climate change debate. My take is that there is not good evidence to accept the hypothesis that climate change is an existential threat and that there is good evidence to accept the hypothesis that that those who think it is are wrong.
IPPC's Confidence Grows as Models Get Worse
The opening chart shows that the climate models the IPPC uses to predict temperature changes wildly overestimate them. These are the predictions used by many to conclude that climate change is an existential threat.
Go to the plots. The actual data suggests that temperature sensitivity to CO2 is substantially below what the climate models suggest. Which is right - models with predictions that don't match what happens or the data?
A short paper on the practicality of alternate energy sources vs. what you hear from the media, politicians, and climate extremists.
The science does not appear to be settled.
A comment on the Scientific American climate change article
Gee, you can't even trust the Scientific American anymore.
No comments:
Post a Comment